Hola Jose Alberto, me alegro de sus buenos resultados con la dieta. Faltaría evaluar las enzimas hepáticas y la creatinina, probablemente si esten dentro de los otros 35 elementos que le evaluaron. Otro tipo de estudios preventivos depende de su historia familiar y los factores de riesgo que presente, ya es a criterio de su médico (se ocupa hacer una historia clínica completa para esto). Por ejemplo algo que no menciono fue su glucosa y la hemoglobina glucosilada (esto ultimo no es necesario que la saque si no es diabético), se podría requerir monitorizar si presentaba riesgo para alguna enfermedad metabólica. Saludos
Por que es malo para usted cetosis
A short-lived increase in seizure frequency may occur during illness or if ketone levels fluctuate. The diet may be modified if seizure frequency remains high, or the child is losing weight. Loss of seizure-control may come from unexpected sources. Even "sugar-free" food can contain carbohydrates such as maltodextrin, sorbitol, starch, and fructose. The sorbitol content of suntan lotion and other skincare products may be high enough for some to be absorbed through the skin and thus negate ketosis.
La cantidad de carbohidratos se encuentran en una envoltura de Chick-fil-A
A study with an intent-to-treat prospective design was published in 1998 by a team from the Johns Hopkins Hospital and followed-up by a report published in 2001. As with most studies of the ketogenic diet, no control group (patients who did not receive the treatment) was used. The study enrolled 150 children. After three months, 83% of them were still on the diet, 26% had experienced a good reduction in seizures, 31% had had an excellent reduction, and 3% were seizure-free.[Note 7] At 12 months, 55% were still on the diet, 23% had a good response, 20% had an excellent response, and 7% were seizure-free. Those who had discontinued the diet by this stage did so because it was ineffective, too restrictive, or due to illness, and most of those who remained were benefiting from it. The percentage of those still on the diet at two, three, and four years was 39%, 20%, and 12%, respectively. During this period, the most common reason for discontinuing the diet was because the children had become seizure-free or significantly better. At four years, 16% of the original 150 children had a good reduction in seizure frequency, 14% had an excellent reduction, and 13% were seizure-free, though these figures include many who were no longer on the diet. Those remaining on the diet after this duration were typically not seizure-free, but had had an excellent response.