Atención: Dietaproteica10 es un blog de carácter informativo, de temas relacionados con salud, nutrición y bienestar, nunca debe de ser utilizado como sustituto al diagnóstico médico o tratamiento sin antes consultar a un médico colegiado.Los suplementos alimenticios aquí mencionados no deben utilizarse como alternativos a una dieta equilibrada variada, y un estilo de vida saludable.
Por que mis niveles de cetona bajos en la manana
Normalmente es imposible alcanzar valores que sobrepasen los 8–10 mmol/l solamente consumiendo una dieta cetogénica. Esto significa que algo está mal. La causa más común con diferencia es la diabetes de tipo 1 con una falta grave de insulina. Los síntomas son sentirse muy enfermo con náuseas, vómitos, dolores abdominales y confusión. El resultado final puede ser un estado potencialmente mortal que se llama la cetoacidosis. Evidentemente, los niveles anormalmente altos de cetonas requieren una atención médica urgente. Aprende más
The ketogenic diet is not a benign, holistic, or natural treatment for epilepsy; as with any serious medical therapy, complications may result. These are generally less severe and less frequent than with anticonvulsant medication or surgery. Common but easily treatable short-term side effects include constipation, low-grade acidosis, and hypoglycaemia if an initial fast is undertaken. Raised levels of lipids in the blood affect up to 60% of children and cholesterol levels may increase by around 30%. This can be treated by changes to the fat content of the diet, such as from saturated fats towards polyunsaturated fats, and if persistent, by lowering the ketogenic ratio. Supplements are necessary to counter the dietary deficiency of many micronutrients.
Que alimentos matar las celulas cancerosas
A study with an intent-to-treat prospective design was published in 1998 by a team from the Johns Hopkins Hospital and followed-up by a report published in 2001. As with most studies of the ketogenic diet, no control group (patients who did not receive the treatment) was used. The study enrolled 150 children. After three months, 83% of them were still on the diet, 26% had experienced a good reduction in seizures, 31% had had an excellent reduction, and 3% were seizure-free.[Note 7] At 12 months, 55% were still on the diet, 23% had a good response, 20% had an excellent response, and 7% were seizure-free. Those who had discontinued the diet by this stage did so because it was ineffective, too restrictive, or due to illness, and most of those who remained were benefiting from it. The percentage of those still on the diet at two, three, and four years was 39%, 20%, and 12%, respectively. During this period, the most common reason for discontinuing the diet was because the children had become seizure-free or significantly better. At four years, 16% of the original 150 children had a good reduction in seizure frequency, 14% had an excellent reduction, and 13% were seizure-free, though these figures include many who were no longer on the diet. Those remaining on the diet after this duration were typically not seizure-free, but had had an excellent response.